| > Your Your assumptions clinging is staggering. Thank Reason that you put '(?)' preliminary marks - that you do not then follow. > was that the EU itself needs to be entirely abolished No, I wrote "should never have been born". Abolishing it does not remove the immense damages it caused. You are keeping your analytical processes very loose. > If you apply that same standard, do you think cessation is what Of course comparable cases entail comparable judgements?! But the USA, for example, about the destruction of cars the eu perpetrated, install 4-cylinder engines in the same models that in the eu are sold with 3-cylinders to stay within the regulations. So, not specifically comparable in the destructive effort, nor in the effect. > [] Bad system, powerful entities that are systemically faulty hence damaging, must not be let into activity. As simple as this in principle - it is just logically self-contained. |