|
|
|
|
|
by fphilipe
22 days ago
|
|
This is what has been frustrating me most lately. Even though I have a rule in my global CLAUDE.md that says: > Only write comments to explain the why when it is not obvious from the code (rationale, gotchas, constraints). Do not comment on the what — well-named code already says it. Do not comment on how a framework works. It still keeps adding these bad comments. When I then ask it to review the comments based on my preferences it then deletes most of them or improves them. Today I asked Claude why it disrespects my preference and it said that the surrounding code was like that and it followed that style. It suggested I add this line to my global CLAUDE.md file: > The comment rule above beats the style of the surrounding code: neighboring files with what-style comments are not license to write more of them, and comments carried along when porting or copying code must be re-judged against the rule, not kept for consistency. Let's see if that improves things. |
|
Maybe these would work better for such cases.