Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ActionHank 18 days ago
From what I've seen, LLMs just accelerate or compound this whole process as well.

Everyone has the same group think, it bleeds into the way the LLM generates code and ultimately it just rots teams.

2 comments

I do consulting, I see lots of teams using LLM's to "speed run to a legacy code base".

Much of what goes on in corporate America is not blindness its accretion. They simply dont have the culture to evolve. The devotion to next quarters numbers and share holder value play a massive part in this.

> They simply dont have the culture to evolve. The devotion to next quarters numbers and share holder value play a massive part in this.

I think this sums up the problems pointed out by the article, as well as most organizational problems in general.

When I was younger, I thought management was basically useless, do-nothing mucky mucks, who did more harm than good. This can still be true, but I've changed my opinion. Hiring and firing is hard. Creating a strong and healthy culture is hard. Defining success, and steering the ship to it is hard.

I think as long as money is the measurement of success, particularly from a short-term viewpoint, nothing can change. Public companies basically cannot evolve their form, because boards and shareholders will rarely agree to leave money on the table for an opaque long view that prioritizes culture over profit.

> Hiring and firing is hard. Creating a strong and healthy culture is hard. Defining success, and steering the ship to it is hard.

A big subset of these issues are American business culture.

> Public companies basically cannot evolve their form, because boards and shareholders will rarely agree to leave money on the table for an opaque long view that prioritizes culture over profit.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co. makes a lot of this possible.

Other corporate structures are possible: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation

Corporations were the original AIs. They were slower, a bit less predictable, but they were superhuman intelligence disciplined to produce only the most bland depersonalised slop at all times.
And, in fact, corporations are why AIs produce what they do - because they were trained on the output of corporations.
They were trained on the output of Reddit mostly. Its a miracle they even work at all given that.
Interesting take. I assume that, because corporations are a subset of “groups of people” that this applies to any group? The theory here being that, in the same way that LLMs produce the average of everything they’ve trained on, a group of people produces the average of every individual’s ideas and efforts (subject to things like some people having more power than others, etc.)?

I don’t think this is always true, however. It’s provably false, actually, because I can name at least one group of people that has done something unique and not sloppy. For example, the C8 Corvette is pretty sweet. So is Costco’s supply chain and employment practices. And I also think Pink Floyd’s music is pretty non-average.

If every member of a group is above average then the output would also be above average?