I wrote that because I wanted to avoid a sterile discussion on whether or not my comment was valid because the article was not written by a human.
As I said, the actual remark I made is independent on whether this article was written by an LLM or not.
It's still pretty obvious to me that it was, but I'm not sure what kind of "proof" you are looking for, you know as well as I do that it can't be proven one way or the other, so who cares?
I do care. Of course I know it can't be proven. But you could know the author,bwhat do I know. I just don't understand why people claim factual knowledge when they don't. It rubs me the wrong way and rightly so.
As I said, the actual remark I made is independent on whether this article was written by an LLM or not.
It's still pretty obvious to me that it was, but I'm not sure what kind of "proof" you are looking for, you know as well as I do that it can't be proven one way or the other, so who cares?