|
|
|
|
|
by esjeon
19 days ago
|
|
Possibly: 1. Piggybacking established brand names (Postgres + Rust) 2. … without practicality nor advancement (e.g. this solves no extra problems) 3. … without trust (i.e. LLM-driven rewrite, with no capabilities to thoroughly review it) I think people get easily upset when the title has high-signal names like Postgres, and the title touts it somehow, yet it’s obviously impractical for obvious reasons (short-/long-term practicality, social trust & network effect, etc) |
|
But then its credibility would be abysmally low, which makes it undesirable for the authors.