[johnnyanmac]

>It is market capture, and you don’t get to just hand wave it away with how it’s only philosophical.

I don't get to declare it one way just because I think it's true either.

If people truly want all their eggs in one basket, is it market capture if you are 100% upfront (which these companies aren't, but lets suppose), and people come into it anyway? I suppose my philosophy here comes down to "you can only protect people from themselves for so long before exploitation simply becomes business". Why try and spout freedom to those who actively seek someone or something to be controlled by? Why spout principles of ownership to those who will relinquish it every time for a "cheap" subscription?

Now the real answer is another scary word to this community: regulation. It's been beyond time we had proper digital ownership laws. But we're a very long road away from that in the US.

[Forgeties79]

Ain’t scary to me. Regulation all the way.

I just don’t generally agree with variations of “caveat emptor”