| > If you're acting in good faith and your accountant does something crazy or evil, your liability is limited to some extent. From my understanding, you are the person signing off on the paperwork that is submitted to the IRS. There is this cache 22 with taxes. You are responsible, but you outsource it to a accountant. Because you are not knowledgeable about the taxes. But you are expected to be knowledgeable to understand the tax documents that you submit to the IRS. That is why the accountant always ask you to review the documents and sign them like 20 times. The same applies when you run a company, depending on the country, you need to prove yourself knowledgeable in accounting, before you are allowed to run a company. Normally that is included in a university degree, but if you have a middle school diploma, you need to do a official examen to get that degree. Whatever you submit for your company, you are again responsible. Even if you hired a accountant. So while technically, if a accountant makes gross mistakes, the bill will always fall in your lap, because you are expected to understand the reports you submit to the IRS. And catch any errors before doing so. With the IRS, the burden of proving your innocents is often put you. Its because the good faith argument can be misused easily. That is why the buck stops at you. So using a LLM or a accountant, really does not matter. Sure, a accountant can go to jail if there has been major issues (its not going to be with one client issue). But you can lose your house / company, have your life ruined by whatever you submitted. |
An accountant may not save you from financial penalties but I believe that they are liable for them so you can recover it from their insurance.