|
|
|
|
|
by nateb2022
23 days ago
|
|
> So if police can observe things freely and they can record their observations, well can't police departments store and search through police records? This is unnecessarily reductive; if we reduce all action enough we can justify anything as simply continuous 1 centimeter movement; e.g. grand theft would be innocently grasping an object in a store, and then a series of 1 centimeter movements which you could independently justify as "freedom to move." We understand complex actions to have complex consequences, and the aggregation of vehicular data is itself a search, which by our laws requires a warrant. Jurisprudence evaluates the totality of an act and its consequences. > The state will take for itself power that the people have but do not wield. The Framers of the Constitution would understand this idea as tyranny. |
|