[bradley13]

Stupid parliamentary trick: Hold the vote on the day before the summer break - ensuring that many people have already returned to their home countries. Then use a sort of "reverse" parliamentary trick: the default is that this legislation is accepted. They needed an absolute majority - not of voting members, but of all members - to reject it.

Result: 314 against, 276 in favor, 17 abstentions, 113 absent

The EU is well on the way to becoming a totalitarian government.

ETA: It is shocking that 276 members of parliament would vote to support this. Are so many so naive? Or being paid off?

[krick]

It's "not on the way", really. It is explicitly designed not to be democratic in any meaningful sense from the very beginning. It is not even a secret: the council work is intentionally opaque so that the actual people responsible for all this horrible stuff cannot be held accountable by the public. This is explicitly stated to be a feature, justified that it helps it all be more technocratic and less populist.

Seriously, the only reason why it takes place IMO is just that nobody ever cares to think for a moment how decisions are made in the EU, so everyone is somewhat indifferent and there's no mass attention to the fact, that the general public ability to affect EU decision is near zero, far, far less than USA or Russia and probably even China.

[Xelbair]

Which would be fine, if it was just a trade union like originally designed. I really love the original idea of EU. I could even get behind more federation style, although trade union is vastly preferable for me - but I do understand people pushing for it.

Yet EU has overstepped that ages ago, and you can see that with SKG recently. The only tool we, as citizens, have to actually try to affect EC is effectively useless. EC can be wined and dined by lobbyists, including outside of official recorded proceedings(!) and can just ignore you.

Not to mention a lot of other systems in EU were made with idea that countries would operate for their own best interest, and that interest was aligned for every member state:

- Shared energy market, which was crashed by Germany ideologically decommissioning nuclear power plants in middle of energy crisis.

- Free movement of people within Schengen area - which is crashed by countries taking mass of immigrants which they think they need(i don't live there so i won't judge), but then they can move around whole of the area - including the countries with vastly stricter regulations for migration.

- Digital euro as a backdoor to enforce transition to euro across the whole area, limiting the ways in which member states can dictate their own monetary policy. Digital euro must be accepted by all vendors across EU - even in the countries not using euro at all.

And that's ignoring slippery slope towards CDBC with expiration date.

- erosion of free speech and constant doublethink language, and noticing flaws in EU is undemocratic/euroskeptical(biggest sin possible) - even if it comes from "how to improve EU" point of view. or even if one points out that EU itself isn't democratic.

- double loyalty in case of politicians where there's a conflict between national and European interest. Do you pursue national benefit, or do you go against it in such cases and hop onto EU track - where there are plenty of unelected positions?

and also double loyalty in case of EC members - they should pursue good of all EU by their own charter, but there's no punishment nor anything systemic to discourage them from abusing their power and pursuing national interests.

All of those are minor or major flaws that slowly fracture EU. And by this point I don't think the system can be reformed.

[ololobus]

> Then use a sort of "reverse" parliamentary trick: the default is that this legislation is accepted. They needed an absolute majority - not of voting members, but of all members - to reject it.

No pun intended, but how is this legal? I mean, if you don’t have a quorum, then shouldn’t you just wait for an Autumn session? It feels like having a democratic parliament with backdoors like this kinda undermines the whole idea

[bloppe]

Sounds like they did have quorum (84% present). I'm assuming the "trick" is related to the fact that it was an expired law up for renewal instead of a brand new law, which sounds pretty dumb to me. Maybe I'm mistaken about the details tho. I'm just some guy

[parineum]

> It is shocking that 276 members of parliament would vote to support this. Are so many so naive? Or being paid off?

There are a lot of countries in the EU that aren't shining beacons of democracy.

The EU makes sense as an economic block but some of the countries in it are politically unaligned with what people think of when they think of the EU.

[usrnm]

You really should check out the list of voters, you will be surprised who exactly voted "yes". The list can be found here: https://www.thatprivacyguy.com/blog/chat-control-the-415-who...

[ricardobeat]

The “for” votes are for the reject motion in this case.

[yreg]

That is not the full list, plenty of votes are missing.

This one is more complete: https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/195338

[StingyJelly]

https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ has a better way to sort by country and political party so you can see who woted for what. It is painful to see politicians I voted for supporting this, even after I have sent them a few emails. Honestly, based on the results from my country, in the upcomming euro-elections, I am seriously considering voting alt-right.

[jvidalv]

You will be surprised to discover that the most open pro-democracy and “leftist” are also the most fascist and speech controlling ones.

At least in Spain this is exactly the case, and is really scary how much people falls for it.

[pojzon]

Yea, like France or Germany or Belgium

You know Im right

[solidsnack9000]

I don't understand how it is that the EU Parliaments votes to reject legislation. Presumably, this is not the default for most rules. Is this some special class of rule -- put together by a special committee, for example -- that has to be voted down rather than up?

[Ylpertnodi]

>ensuring that many people have already returned to their home countries...

Aren't they fucking paid to be there 'on the last day'?

[poszlem]

Yeah, there are two scummy things happening here. This would not be possible if they did their job. What sort of weird example does it set, when they don't ever care enough to stay for all the voting?

[xienze]

> Stupid parliamentary trick: Hold the vote on the day before the summer break - ensuring that many people have already returned to their home countries.

Maybe people should demand better of their representatives. Would YOUR job be OK with you not being able to perform your duties the day BEFORE your vacation starts? The time to go home is when your vacations STARTS, not one or more days before.

[encom]

The EU and corrupt politicians (that's most of them), will do what they want, regardless of your opinions. I have completely given up on participating in democracy. My country is going to hell, and I don't believe anyone is able to stop it.

[wartywhoa23]

> Are so many so naive?

No, it's the clueless general public that is criminally naive and fails to recognize the revival of fascism in real time under their own noses.

It's something straight out of that 2015 German movie, "Er ist wieder da" ("Look Who's Back").

Same giggles, same reactions, same gaslighting of those who see where it's heading, same final effect.

[dyauspitr]

The internet is pretty stupid now and needs to be reigned in so our sons and daughters aren’t wide eyed zombies. Most of you won’t agree with me but it’s true and something needs to be done so I laud this.

[logicchains]

Our parents are the zombies who keep voting for the destruction of their civilization just to keep their housing prices propped up.

[Scroll_Swe]

The internet is not the problem, the algo is.

With the internet I have free MIT lessons, documentaries, debates on Youtube!

I have access to scientific journals.

I can access every book ever written in the world.

The internet is not the issue here. The homepages/fyp on youtube, tiktok, instagram is. Books and the correct asthetic needs to be prioritized.

[dyauspitr]

That internet will still exist, you just won’t be anonymous while accessing those resources.

[Scroll_Swe]

My issue is that one.

AND that politicians and the sites WANT age verification because the sites wont have to fix their algo.

The block lists are crazy, even Youtube is blocked. Instead of fixing fyp and promoting non-brainrot content, they rather slap an age gate on it.

[josephg]

Chat control doesn’t make the internet any less stupid.

[thin_carapace]

"give me a boy until he is seven and I will tell you the man he becomes"

there will be at least 1 entire generation of western kids that spectated short form content on screens since the moment of birth. based on aristotle, this entire generation is going to be retarded. the EU legislature in question enables legal spectation of content exchanged by a generation of the retarded. the optimal path forward seems to be ensuring that the next generation is not retarded, otherwise human extinction will be rapidly accelerated. I don't see how corporate destruction of individual privacy is going to help ensure that the next generation is not retarded.

[Eueudhsbsj32]

Why just western kids? Cell phone and tablet use by little kids in Asia is on a whole other level.

[Hugsbox]

The content children in Asia are exposed to seems to be entirely different in nature. For instance, with Tiktok: it intentionally pushes brainrot content for western users, while in China it pushes educational and in general positive content. Speaking only from what I've read on the subject, and I'm entirely willing to accept that I'm wrong about that, but the point remains that the screens aren't the issue, it's the content on them that is.

[thin_carapace]

did you read any studies that accounted for brain rot short form content vs non brain rot short form content? from my n=1 sample, this content format is universally destructive, regardless as to specific information conveyed

[Hugsbox]

This I can definitely agree with

[thin_carapace]

I have no experience with the way children are raised in asia and am horrified that this phenomenon is not constrained to one particular region

[Scroll_Swe]

Why did you think it was?

[thin_carapace]

I hoped that my tunnel visioned perspective only applied to that which I could see. to be fair according to another commentor asian kids don't get pushed brain rot, so I suppose there are degrees to this

[protocolture]

Why will basing them on Aristotle make them retarded?

[thin_carapace]

the opening quote is attributed to aristotle

[protocolture]

Ok but the opening quote doesn't say "I agree with this poster that these kids will be retarded"

[Hugsbox]

My brother in christ, please, reading comprehension. The opening quote is saying that a child's formative years will decide how they turn out.

[int_19h]

Your sons and daughters will still be wide eyed zombies, it's just that now your government will decide what mush to turn their brains into.

[charlieyu1]

I heard about it 30 years ago