[jrmg]

I actually find it hard to read. Something about it is hard to follow, and I have to think very hard to keep the ‘story’ straight in my head. I keep having to re-read sections, which it not normal for me.

This doesn’t make much intuitive sense to me because shouldn’t output based on statistics have a very strong through line?

This is where I really first got lost:

“You can’t run a greenhouse without gas unless you can see the moments it slips — a fault, a silent fallback — and close them one at a time. The monitoring doesn’t undermine the gas-free promise. It’s what makes the promise keepable.”

[fwip]

100% this came out of an LLM-debugging session, reformatted by LLM into an article.