|
|
|
|
|
by skinfaxi
23 days ago
|
|
I appreciate that quote. My take was indeed founded on the majority opinion, which holds out non-physical intrusions as a separate issue that the verdict did not reach. "It may be that achieving the same result through electronic means, without an accompanying trespass, is an unconstitutional invasion of privacy, but the present case does not require us to answer that question." |
|