|
|
|
|
|
|
by oblio
23 days ago
|
|
|
AI <<can>> do a lot of things, but does it actually do that without an exhaustive test suite (which legacy software generally doesn't have, and it can never be 100%, anyway)? Between context collapse and hallucinations, how likely is it that the end result isn't slightly polished slop that misses lots of crucial details? |
|
|