|
|
|
|
|
|
by Gigachad
23 days ago
|
|
|
The parent comment isn’t about remote attestation. It was a claim that since the iPhone isn’t bulletproof then all security must be pointless. When the reality is the iPhone is actually quite a good example that great security is possible with enough investment. |
|
|
Nobody was ever claiming that. The claim is that because it isn't bulletproof, remote attestation is pointless, since it has a different failure mode where once keys can be extracted the attacker can't be deprived of them, so there is no way to return the installed base of existing devices to a state of being able to trust their attestations.