> But my guess is that maybe it doesn’t have as robust a test suite?
Not sure about what's going on over there, but over the last year Claude Code has gotten way better, I sure hope that they're working on a good enough test suite to avoid a crapload of regressions (and pave way for more refactoring, should they need it).
Things improved tremendously the first month after they acquired Bun. People like Jared (bun creator) worked relentlessly on the performance bottlenecks, and posted details on X as he worked through them. I remember just launching claude code used to take multiple seconds, and within a month it went down to instant.