[daishi55]

> There’s no way in hell it’s maintainable

This is not an assertion you are qualified to make

> Go read any analysis of the Claude Code leak for proof

You seem to be implying that Claude code is unmaintainable. Yet they appear to be maintaining it just fine. Did I misunderstand your implication?

[fragmede]

Claude code is buggy and they don't appear to be maintaining it just fine.

[daishi55]

I use it all day every day and haven’t noticed any bugs.

And the fact is that they are maintaining it and it is one of the most successful software products of all time and is earning them mountains of cash. By any metric it is a successful product. So obviously whatever they are doing is working.

[cozzyd]

Powertop tells me claude-cli creates an inordinate amount of wakeups, halving my laptops battery life if I leave it open. For a tui that should be doing nothing when I'm not interacting with it...

[dgan]

You and the parent are arguing over different, orthogonal things. I believe the parent argues over "efficiency"(=being able to achieve a goal for given amount of ressources) while you are replying over "efficacy" (=being able to achieve a goal). Both could be called 'maintainability' and nobody explicitely tells what definition they use, so all the long pointless discussions could be avoided if people agreed on terms

[jdkoeck]

Last time I used it, it was a a flicker fest. Has it been fixed?