[lemagedurage]

I don't think it was written by an LLM, some things stand out:

The congratulations text is both in English and Japanese. Contains a single heart emoji.

There was an intention to have a cyan to orange gradient, but the range starts in an ANSI block, ends halfway through the 256 color block and 256 terminal colors are not arranged like a gradient at all.

There's no sleep at the end of the loop where I feel like an LLM would add that defensively.

[n2j3]

Human here. I added a sleep 0.5 at the end, it's too fast to read otherwise. Makes for a nice terminal screensaver!

[INTPenis]

Hi fellow human, I got the same idea. Just a sleep 0.1 before the echo "" makes it readable. Otherwise it scrolls way too fast.

[make3]

"the code is not quite detail oriented enough to be AI", times are changing

[pkilgore]

Flawless, completely unnecessary abstraction is a better tell of LLM code than "comment clearly responding to a part of a prompt that I cannot see".

[DaSHacka]

More like 'not boilerplate-y enough'

[lemagedurage]

Ehh, AI makes plenty mistakes but they have a different vibe to it.

In my mind an AI would do something the most popular way even when that's not appropriate.

A human might do things in an unpopular way even when that's not appropriate.