[NonHyloMorph]

What is your argument exactly?

You establish, that it is virtuous to not fall for the hybris that claiming knowledge beyond the scope of your domain is. (i.e. the virtuous physisit who does not mistake his encounter with some institutional courses in chemistry for a foundation to transgress against "the chemist" by pretending to grasp chemistry like the latter does)

Now what is it exactly that you want to put forward regarding the faculty of philosophically trained cognition again?

[DoctorOetker]

"There is substance in philosophy, don't get me wrong, but just not that much of it"

[gopher_space]

Start thinking about where your numbers come from. Do some qualitative to quantitative conversions for a system with a feedback loop.

[NonHyloMorph]

The more the studies of substances progress the more that concept slips through our fingers