Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by NooneAtAll3 21 days ago
again, you're approaching it from perspective "both sides get caught" being a possibility

when in actuality the choice is between "both sides steal" or "one side steals"

and allowing both sides to steal is in no way better

---

the main way desired "both sides get caught" state becomes a thing is after "one side" splits in two - still being close in horizontal connections to stabilize, but with developed instruments for either half to guard against the other

1 comments

No, I tried to be pretty clear that "at least one side got caught" is not always better than "nobody got caught" if corruption dictates who gets caught.
it's not corruption that dictates who gets caught - it's power balance

crying about oppression only leaves you stuck in "everyone steals" state