[pqtyw]

Apple's proposal was only for photos being uploaded to iCloud and not local ones.

IIRC weren't there some thoughts that they'd switch iCloud to E2E but add local scanning on upload (compare to what it currently when Apple, Google, etc. freely scan all your cloud photos anyway). That didn't seem like a terrible deal on paper.

[vekker]

What does "scanning" mean though?

Does this mean every parent has to now make sure not to take pictures of their children playing in bath for instance, in order not to trip these scans for false positives?

[u8080]

>in order not to trip these scans for false positives

They CLAIM they scan for CSAM, so watch out your documents and pictures with something that govt also wants to track.

[sneak]

No. iCloud Photos and Files are and have always been non-e2ee and they already scan everything in it.

Even with e2ee enabled for iCloud Photos/files (which NOBODY uses, and furthermore is entirely disabled in the UK), it sends identifying hashes of plaintext file content to the server without e2ee.

[SXX]

E2EE on iCloud with advanced data protectiob still keeps metadata not encrypted likely exactly for this purpose.