The article you're talking about literally opens "I think Dual EC is a backdoor". You don't understand it. You don't know who Paul Hoffman even is. Why would we keep discussing this?
Because both the article and your continued arguments about ML-KEM demonstrates that in confirmed cases of NSA sabotage and in hypothetical cases of NSA sabotage, your job is to deflect, minimize, and avoid any responsibility being doled out. I hope you’re well paid for this job.
When we find out that the ML-KEM math was thoroughly broken by NSA for years, your response will be “gosh, nobody could have known that. It’s best not to hold anyone responsible though, certainly not the NIST employees whose names are all over the evidence…”
Again: you pretty clearly don't understand the article you're citing. And that's easy mode compared to LWE vs RLWE. I don't think there's anything productive to be gained from us continuing to talk.
When we find out that the ML-KEM math was thoroughly broken by NSA for years, your response will be “gosh, nobody could have known that. It’s best not to hold anyone responsible though, certainly not the NIST employees whose names are all over the evidence…”