[geraneum]

>I don’t have access to my flavor of LLM on the train nor the time or budget to have it do the research and summary for me

Aren't you gonna let the LLM develop for you anyway? Why bother writing and reading a post at all?

> pretending like pre-LLM era blogs were these pristinely well written pieces of art

The point is the effort and care that the writer puts which differentiates it from automatically generated text. That matters because a human can sympathize and that leads to better understanding and greater connection. That's why a post is written.

> Don’t get me started on the mess that was the communication of this particular company or one of their competitors like AWS.

And we criticize those as well. Nothing's changed. Yesterday's bad content is today's slop (plus a mind boggling amount of investment, corruption and environmental side effects).

[lijok]

Honestly sounds to me like you have a bone to pick with AI in general. Negative sentiment on a particular LLM authored blog post muddies the waters and misrepresents your valid points. Not the way to do this IMO. Happy to be corrected.