[kccqzy]

You are not entirely wrong, but there’s still a difference between being dead and very stable. Among the languages that compile to JS, I would look at ClojureScript as the prime example of stability rather than Elm. I mean Elm has removed features breaking compat; ClojureScript doesn’t do that.

[iLemming]

> ClojureScript doesn’t do that.

I remember when Rich Hickey was asked "what feature of Clojure you regret and would like to remove?", he said: "None. Doing that would break stuff for people".

[hobofan]

> I mean Elm has removed features breaking compat

To be fair, Elm hasn't made it to 1.0 (yet). That's where languages should make breaking changes before being stuck with the flaws forever.

[crote]

... which is totally fine, but that's also why you can hardly call it "stable".