[Kudos]

Why are you assuming Zuck's expectations for progress of _his_ product have anything to do with the impact of that category of product for its users?

[hatefulheart]

I’m sorry, what’s the question? Genuinely not sure.

I’ll rephrase, Zuckerberg would certainly enjoy agentic coding to be a wild success because it means less staff and more products he could fail to create.

[Kudos]

Again, Zuck's success criteria don't necessarily align with that of others. In fact, I'd expect his success criteria are substantially different to most.

[alt227]

Making money? Seems to be the common success criteria for all.

[hlynurd]

It can both be a wild success and not what he expected.

[hatefulheart]

These two not mutually exclusive?

“Wild success” and “going slower than expected”?

Wake me up when words have a meaning again.

[ben_w]

> These two not mutually exclusive?

Correct, they are not.

Consider: Someone who "expects" their bank account to have $100M in it before they turn 30 and "only" gets it to $10M.

From the point of view of a normal sane person, they are experiencing "wild success", and yet at the same time they are definitely "going slower than [they] expected".

[Miner49er]

Pretty sure Zuck was talking about agents in general, not specifically Meta agents.

[Octoth0rpe]

More importantly, he's really probably talking about 'superintelligence', rather than just building genuinely useful and monetizable models.