|
|
|
|
|
|
by roughly
23 days ago
|
|
|
> in many corners, "don't manually write code" is being joined by "don't manually read code" as an attractive principle. I'm pretty sure I know where the failure case on that one is. The reason we're still manually reading code is to catch the failures and edge cases that the LLM fails to; not reading the code doesn't magically make the code good. |
|
|