[droithomme]

I actually read his Twitter feed before posting. It was massively vandalized by Prismatic, who was clearly impersonating him.

The claimed bug is that the were not clear in getting permissions. That is completely irrelevant to the core of the principle here. They are fraudulently impersonating him, using his own account. That is a fact and it is a verifiable fact.

Given that you feel motivated to justify it, I have added your company Clever to my list of dodgy companies I will have nothing to do with. Thank you for informing me of your questionable ethics.

[azylman]

To quote The Princess Bride: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

You say that both me and the guy from Prismatic are trying to "justify" his actions, but that's completely false. Nowhere did I say that doing something like that was acceptable behavior, nor did he. I agree that impersonating a user and posting to their social media accounts without their approval is unethical and immoral.

However, he said that it was an accident, a bug - that the intended behavior was not this unethical and immoral action, but something else entirely. You proceeded to accuse him of justifying it and being "in a state of delusion, blinded to ethics and respect".

And now you said that same thing to me, more or less.

If anyone here has questionable ethics, it's you. You COMPLTELY MADE UP these actions of other people, MALICIOUSLY, and used it to libel them.

[thezilch]

Can you provide the verified facts? I've yet to see where a granted permission is _fraudulently_ used. I've yet to even see or see reproduced these supposed facts. In fact, the token granted from Twitter is a non-rate-limited permission to tweet indefinitely; the only abuse here is a user's trust; but that shouldn't preclude Prismatic from making good on a mistake before they are chastised forevermore.