[WD-42]

> Three names, one thing. That’s why they blur together.

Stopped reading here. This is an AI article.

[GlobalChubby]

Just to play devil's advocate: why? There's nothing a priori that suggests AI-written content is less pedagogically sound than human written content?

[empthought]

We don’t need aggregators like HN pitching AI-authored content, no matter how pedagogically sound. We can direct our own AIs to generate our own AI-authored content.

[paulddraper]

It's not necessarily less sound.

But it is a suggestion.

Human authors only write what they think is valuable. AI content lacks that signal.

[WD-42]

Because the style is irritating, and as usual: if the author can't be bothered to write it, I can't be bothered to read it.

[JSR_FDED]

Thanks