|
|
|
|
|
by wsve
23 days ago
|
|
All your examples make clear to the customer that their access is temporary and conditional on their continued and ongoing payment, and that ownership of the good/service is retained by the seller. On the other hand, "buying a game" is given the guise of ownership, despite true ownership still being retained by the seller, obscured by the fact you're making a one-time payment. It'd be reasonable if the terminology used was "rent" or "subscribe" to a game with a periodic payment, but that's not what's advertised. It is deceiving, unnecessary, and anti-consumer. |
|
Clearly, more thoughtless regulation will solve the problem this time.