[xigoi]

> Screw the dyslexic and colourblind, I guess.

You can also use checkmark/cross icons for success/failure. And What does this have to do with dyslexia?

> What's clearer? [Call] or [(telephone receiver emoji) Call]?

We’re arguing about flat vs. skeuomorphic design, so more like:

What's clearer? [(simple phone icon) Call] or [(photorealistic drawing of a telephone receiver) Call]?

[Telaneo]

> You can also use checkmark/cross icons for success/failure. And What does this have to do with dyslexia?

Your comment on typography.

> What's clearer? [(simple phone icon) Call] or [(photorealistic drawing of a telephone receiver) Call]?

The latter.

[xigoi]

> Your comment on typography.

That wasn’t my comment, and GP was presumably referring to things like headings being larger, not some subtle differences that dyslexic people would miss.

> The latter.

Why?

[Telaneo]

> That wasn’t my comment

Sorry about that.

> and GP was presumably referring to things like headings being larger, not some subtle differences that dyslexic people would miss.

I was imagining bold or italics, both of which are easily missed by people who are dyslectic, or using different type faces, which can trip them up. Headings can help, if the text and spacing is suitably big, but I'm not sure what situations that can help much with in typical usage. I'm having a hard time thinking of examples where I would do that beyond what's already common.

> Why?

Easier to recognise as what it's supposed to be and easier to distinguish from other icons. More distinct traits in icons help you recognise something for what it is more quickly.