| > Those "weird websites" have a reputation one can track. Do they? I mean, I don't track them. But as an example, let's use CBC. They've published nearly a redaction per day on their stories... https://www.cbc.ca/news/corrections-clarifications-1.5893564 They're a government run, public broadcaster and they're this poor... But they're an acceptable Wikipedia source. Meanwhile, someone like the Primeagen has 1.15 million followers and has used Odin. That's not notable? JangaFX products have been used by creators that cumulatively have millions of subscribers, on top of a website that says they use Odin, on top of the CEO and others X accounts, but that's not enough to convince people JangaFX is a real company with real products? Remember, CNN and all the "trusted" news outlets also have YouTube accounts. |
If Odin is so notable, why haven't any of the normal tech publications ever mentioned it? One company using it does not necessarily make it notable.
> Remember, CNN and all the "trusted" news outlets also have YouTube accounts.
And those YouTube accounts are not considered reliable sources by Wikipedia. In fact, basically only CNN's published articles are considered reliable.