[VorpalWay]

The issue with AI isn't that it can't write embedded code (though it is noticeably worse at it), the issue is specifically with the safety certification of code the AI produced. There is a lot of paper trail to show that you followed all relevant standards, a lot of which pertains to your development process.

It is not just what you do or don't do in the code (e.g. MISRA or CERT C) but there is also a lot about how you test, review, show that your tests cover everything relevant (not just code coverage, but also specification coverage), show how you check that everyone involved followed the process, etc.

[Obscurity4340]

Cant they just implement all the papertrail-generating and checkbox-checking and ass-covering into its instructions or harness?

[ehnto]

The AI can't be held liable so it somewhat defeats the purpose of that kind of paper trail and compliance work. If the threat was losing your livelihood and possibly jail time, would you currently be comfortable being held responsible for AI output?

[foldr]

There's plenty of embedded code in consumer products that doesn't need to meet any special standards like MISRA.

[VorpalWay]

Well sure, but that isn't what my original comment that you were replying downthread of said. I specifically recommended safety critical embedded. :)