|
|
|
|
|
by gigatexal
24 days ago
|
|
With a few extra lines and mapping objects to classes this can be done. To have all this ease of use you give up so much in performance. Most apps and companies never get to the point where performance matters that’s why we have ORMs. |
|
Not really. ORMs (memory) and databases (disk) are distant by multiple orders of magnitude performance wise. Skipping the ORM to shave off some cycles is akin to haggling over a few pennies on your thousand dollars bill.