|
|
|
|
|
|
by discreteevent
27 days ago
|
|
|
My argument was not that LLMs aren't useful but that a compiler is a completely misleading anamlogy. You compared them to humans. Humans live in the world, have a world model, meet people for lunch and exchange ideas. Agents read markdown files and code. Simanwords, you spend a lot of time on HN promoting LLMs and being dismissive of humans in comparison. I have to ask: Whose side are you on? |
|
|
You don't like that LLM's can be compared to compilers because compilers are deterministic. You don't like LLM's being compared to humans because.. LLMs can't meet people for lunch? I don't think determinism was something you were worried about in the first place.
Unfortunately, I think a useful + non deterministic tool is not something people can grasp for some reason