|
|
|
|
|
by kbdiaz
27 days ago
|
|
Isn't the standard to use continuous batching? If they are using continuous batching -- I'm curious why generated token length matters, and why they might be clustering them. If not -- I'm curious why they aren't and what is the tradeoff here. |
|
If they managed to put together some dirty hack that lets them generate about 512 tokens worth of reasoning in parallel instead of in sequence? That would explain it.