[yreg]

> I have never managed to connect to LLM writing, it always comes off as shallow and vapid.

Me too, but I would be careful about being too dismissive, because I would totally bet that at some point the models will be able to write top tier stories.

And there will be people who will find those stories soulless purely based on their origin (which is completely fine!) and call them slop (which I feel hurts the language).

[solid_fuel]

> Me too, but I would be careful about being too dismissive, because I would totally bet that at some point the models will be able to write top tier stories.

Maybe. I'm not certain that the mathematical average of writing is ever going to be all that great. However I'm willing to update my stance the day an LLM writes a story that makes me cry. Until then I am going to be a bit stubborn about it.

[slfnflctd]

Let's also not forget that humans are more than capable of creating tons of 'slop' far worse than any current SOTA model would create, and I would argue the majority of what people write is in this category.

Models are still improving, and if you can't tell whether one was behind what you're currently reading 100% of the time (which I'm sure you know you can't), the distinction no longer matters except in very specific cases, and you have to go to a lot more effort to uncover that distinction.