|
|
|
|
|
|
by crewindream
25 days ago
|
|
|
1. I think burden of proof is on the opposite side. (Previous legislations/directives were circumvented without problem) 2.Asking for hard evidence of top spies secretly spying on heads of other states is … (not sure if there is a word for it; some blend between: unrealistic, unreasonable and oxymoron’ish. If they do their job well, you will not find it out, also it might be illegal or punishable to present such evidence) |
|
|