[meowface]

But just to be clear: you are absolutely, completely denying an LLM played any role in writing any of your comments on HN? You are certain? You're claiming you did not use an LLM in any way in the production of them? Not even to "edit"?

And for the record you were downvoted by other people long before I saw your reply.

[scritty-dev]

I don't use AI; only edits to my posts are made by auto-spell checker. I have exactly 1 downvote. Just yours....

Again with these demeaning comments "you are certain" -- who exactly are you -- the arbiter of what constitutes human vs AI generated content? Yes, I am certain.

EDIT: After testing my own content on GPTZero, I am curious, is that specific platform utilized to determine if my text is AI generated?

[dang]

> I don't use AI; only edits to my posts are made by auto-spell checker

I think you may find that this "auto spell checker" is making many more changes to your text than just spelling corrections. We've encountered this sort of thing in many cases already. This is the sort of thing I was describing in my comment upthread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779752.

[meowface]

I promise your post was already downvoted when I saw it. It is possible some people upvoted it afterwards, changing the net karma.

It is possible you were not intentionally choosing to use an LLM to write/modify your posts, but they largely read like LLM output. The tool you're using may use an LLM and may be rewriting significant portions of your text.