[lcnPylGDnU4H9OF]

This (also not unbiased) comment doesn't provide any substantive arguments other than a character attack on DJB. You'd also be hard-pressed to find an appeal to authority in this article. Lastly, I'm pretty sure the comment I'm replying to is at least partially LLM-generated.

Ironically, it's the incredibly weak pro-standardization arguments that appear to be the most convincing evidence that the proposed standard is actually an instance of NSA meddling.

[phasmantistes]

Zero percent LLM-generated, but this is the first time I've had to defend myself against that claim, so thanks for that!