|
|
|
|
|
by audunw
29 days ago
|
|
I truly don’t understand what value a JIT would provide here. Especially in Zigs case. The language allows for full pre-compilation and the compiler is so blazingly fast it’ll finish compiling faster than the startup time of some interpreted languages. So what would adding an interpreter/JIT achieve? Absolutely nothing. Seems to me the idea of using a JIT here is just because it’s fashionable, not because it solves a real problem. |
|
It is like the dumb idea of header only libraries, most likely pushed by folks that only did scripting languages before coming into a compiled language.
"Linkers? What are those for?"