Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by shh_labs 29 days ago
Being a legal person is not a logical prerequisite for being named as an inventor on that argument alone, because there's not a legal liability that stems from being named as an inventor.

(That's not to say AI should or should not be capable of being named as an inventor).

1 comments

I'm aware. Being named as an inventor is a benefit we sometimes give to people, and the point the other comment was making (as I understood it) is that AI shouldn't be able to only take the good parts of being a person and skip over the potential downsides.