[Zambyte]

> This is "whatabboutism" which is a logical fallacy.

No it isn't. You don't optimize a piece of software by profiling it and rendering a flame graph, and then ignoring the sections of code that the most time is being spent in. You work on optimizing the paths where the most time is being spent, because that is where your effort has the most room for impact. If we are trying to optimize carbon emissions instead of time, we look at the biggest sources of emissions first, because that's where our effort has the most room for impact.

> Someone doesn't have to talk about the climate impacts of cars every time they talk about the climate impacts of AI.

I never said they did. I said they should be fighting both if they actually care about the issue.

> Peruse my personal blog and you will see that I, in fact, ran a whole city council campaign on a platform of "to fight climate change we should not be driving".

Excellent, you are fighting both because you care about the issue. Thank you for your service.