[munksbeer]

Look at the state of the comments on that thread.

"This is completely false! Code is review is to ..." proceeds to state an opinion.

Sometimes, some days, I just look forward to not having to deal with programmer hubris ever again.

[nacozarina]

I remember a time when the sole point of code review was to answer the question 'is this change going to break any other work currently in-progress?' That was it.

it was expected to be a short-duration fixed-scope activity with a clear Go-NoGo answer, and you would have gotten roasted for digressing into navel-gazing and distracted conversations about armchair philosophy. if the change worked as-advertised and didn't break your work, then it was a 'go', get back to work...