[tmach32]

See also: JuiceFS, S3FS, and quite a few others.

We have done loads of research into using object storage wherever we can (given how cheap it is compared to SSDs), and so far it seems like making your application object store-aware is a far surer bet than abstracting S3 behind the file system. The behavior is just too different.

I'm more interested in applications that cleverly use object storage, e.g. AutoMQ, which is quite compatible with Kafka APIs but needs no HDDs.

[the8472]

s3fs doesn't provide posix semantics. It's good enough™ for some uses, but not comparable to what this one is ostensibly providing.

[nyc_pizzadev]

I agree that most usecases are best suited just using S3 directly, but I would check this out if you want an S3 based filesystem: https://fiberfs.io/