[estearum]

It is absolutely good enough lol. We have effective statistical certainty in the results.

Tell me: how do you know the food you eat is safe? How about the water? The air? Do you take any other medicines?

All of those are less well-understood than the COVID vaccines.

[qsera]

> We have effective statistical certainty in the results.

Only if you blindly trust the entities that is doing the studies.

Seriously, I am not sure how anyone with a couple of brain cells between their ears can do that.

>Tell me: how do you know the food you eat is safe? How about the water? The air?

I don't. But one don't have a choice. But for other things, one certainly do.

[estearum]

No, you really don't need to "blindly trust" the entities doing the studies.

I work in clinical trials. I know how they work. You do not.

[qsera]

>I work in clinical trials. I know how they work. You do not.

Ah, that makes perfect sense.

It is hard for a man to understand something when their salary depends on them not understanding it.

[estearum]

It's even harder when he's completely uncurious about how the world actually works ;)

[qsera]

Being curious does not help much if you are easily satisfied by bullshit answers, like "It works because I said so!"

[estearum]

Imagine thinking that placebo-controlled, double-blinded randomized clinical trials say "it works because I said so."

Surprised you don't fall out of your own shoes in your upside-down world.