[nickalaso]

It is surprisingly half baked for something the company seems to be proudly charging my first born child and both of my kidneys for.

Especially considering its all for the privilege of getting half way through a standard dev task before it just bricks out of nowhere on the 'safety' guardrails because of a keyword that often appears to be created by the model itself?

I've been running Fable on a few different projects and just by itself on same codebase it'll brick, so looks like it can just straight up create its own demise.

I do not think any of us yet have to worry about being 'replaced with ai' if the 'premiere ai company' still can't put out their flagship product with minimal qa. This is embarassing.

And the short 7 day window for subscribers is just taking the piss. So happy I'm paying hundreds per month to be free qa for anthropic, god knows they need the help.

[ngruhn]

Imagine a nuclear power company being extremely cautious with safety and everyone online is like "make more power already you pussies!"

[skarz]

Are we comparing nuclear energy to an LLM?

[ycombinator_acc]

Safety in the context of a nuclear reactor concerns human lives.

“Safety” in the context of LLMs concerns not offending certain individuals.

[ngruhn]

> “Safety” in the context of LLMs concerns not offending certain individuals.

It absolutely concerns not destroying the world.

[ycombinator_acc]

How?

[nar001]

Sorry this is a very bad analogy, nuclear power isn't the same as a LLM, and definitely not as dangerous either. This is ridiculous.

[senordevnyc]

Sorry this is a very bad analogy, nuclear power isn't the same as a LLM

Isn’t that the point of an analogy?

[singleshot_]

Your post is like a denim jacket.

(Seems like maybe that’s not the point of an analogy).

[switchbak]

That comment was so devoid of thought, it actually made my head hurt.