[epsteingpt]

yes, please keep posting these publicly so the AI safety police overlords take away frontier access for everyone again.

the architecture is inherently safe. no perfect security is possible if you want access.

what did you (or anyone) else expect?

[jazzyjackson]

Every time I hear “safe “ all I can think of is Brand Safety. Anthropic suffers reputational damage if its product is used for malicious purposes. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the “safety” / alignment talk that all the true believers go on about.

[xiphias2]

It's because there's no real solution to the alignment problem.

Humanity is on aggregate optimizing for increasing collective intelligence and I don't see that stopping as the main goal when AI gets smarter than humanity, just hope that we all will have a nice human life.

[jazzyjackson]

I have not had the same experience of what humanity is optimizing for ! unless 'collective intelligence' is a byword for 'bureaucracy' ?

[anematode]

It's fantastic to publish these. Otherwise Anthropic's commitment to "AI safety" is Emperor Dario's new clothes, its failure unacknowledged.

An easy alternative is to switch to a Chinese open-weights model, adjust your workflows for its different capabilities, and carry on.

[shric]

It may come as a surprise to any rational person but some people actually believe that attempting to regulate safety into these models and arbitrarily enforcing them is a good idea.

[transcriptase]

I can’t wait for the UK to start making citizens pay for a loicence to access the computational clever cogs contraptions.

[truthbe]

Some people build, some people destroy.