[bearjaws]

Since its behind an account wall, I can't tell if they are saying that Opus made the clone for cheaper or that Opus failed? It appears that Fable did far more "work" based on output tokens.

Aside: We should just ban Twitter links. Nobody should be required to make an account to view content on here.

[shaewest]

On the aside, where's the difference between someone posting a Twitter link and an Economist link? Both are locked behind a wall, whether it account-wall or pay-wall.

[bearjaws]

We can ban those too.

[sourcecodeplz]

if we would ban everything that is not 100%: free, ad-free, tracker free

what would we be left to read? couple of snarky remarks and maybe 2-3 paragraph of coherent text.

journalism is a job! money has to come from somewhere

[kbelder]

Well, restricting posts to those actually accessible isn't unreasonable. Allowing them is HN's worst policy, in my humble opinion.

[CamperBob2]

The Economist isn't owned by someone who cheats at video games, subverts the government, and thinks Nazi salutes are funny.

[rpdillon]

Yeah, I have to manually edit the URL to be xcancel instead every time. Maybe there's a grease monkey script around that handles this kind of thing. I can write one if not.

Edit: going to try this out https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/531615-x-com-to-xcancel-co...

[WithinReason]

A general one that covers xcancel:

https://einaregilsson.com/redirector/

Use this:

Redirect: https://x.*

to: https://xcancel.$1

[WithinReason]

xcancel supports articles now:

https://xcancel.com/i/article/2072432348805669139

Here is the result:

https://github.com/nanocoai/nanoclaw/pull/2742

[benj111]

Same with medium. Why?