[psd1]

> If you can’t understand that, you either don’t have children, have a screw loose, or are a child predator.

This is not helpful, don't do it. GP likely has to suppress the urge to call you a stalinist.

GP comment made it clear that they are a free-internet absolutist. You can make no conclusions beyond that.

Absolutism is daft; attack that, if you must.

[jonhohle]

The idea that free access to all information should be available to all people is absolutism. I agree that’s daft.

At least I gave some options.

[psd1]

People have different value systems, and some topics put those in opposition. That is why this debate is so immovable.

No, i don't want kids exposed to snuff and porn and cognitohazards. But be fair: the middle ages was not an extinction event, despite public hangings, single-room family dwellings, and satanic panic.

No, i don't want a sanitised internet. But the internet today is mostly moats and trackers; anarchy lost. Techno-libertarianism needs to understand itself as a counter-culture and find or build a new space for itself, because nobody normal gives a shit if they get bulldozed.