Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by louwrentius 32 days ago
About the - humans aren't accurate either - 'argument'. Why replace people with something objectively worse and more unpredictable?
1 comments

They aren't necessarily worse and more unpredictable. IIRC. hallucination levels for the frontier levels are below equivalent average normal human errors, and they might even be more systematic/predictable to some degree.

But even if they were slightly worse and more unpredictable, they are many times faster and cheaper, for some tasks.

That word 'some' does quite a bit of heavy lifting.

Because there is a ton of work that people tend to perform that falls out the scope of that 'some'. And a lot of work requires alignment with other people, and so on. LLMs don't have agency, despite people hyping 'agents'.

> That word 'some' does quite a bit of heavy lifting.

No, I was just indicating I was not a sith.