| This is on the browsercomp graph, right? In that, it seems sonnet 5 on high costs more than opus 4.8 at a lower pass rate. Am I reading this correctly? Edit: It looks like the key value proposition of the updated model is that it is much better than Sonnet 4.6. Wheras, Sonnet 5 delivers great value (by browsercomp benchmarks and compared to opus) when running in low and medium. So: Sonnet 4.6 should ~never have been run for low, medium or high when Opus 4.8 has been available. Whoops, I think I have some skills that delegate easy stuff to Sonnet. --- I remember Anthropic pivoting everyone's default model to Opus but had not seen it put so starkly before. I am a bit confused on the subscription `/usage` screen. It splits out sonnet usage, and I'd presumed that would have contributed to a lower use of subscription Quota. But if this is correct, Sonnet usage was basically like smoking unfiltered cigarettes. |