Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by vekntksijdhric 29 days ago
showing a list of bugs and vulnerabilities is not a compelling case against systemd, or it is a compelling case agains every single piece of software.... providing an argument *why* systemd is bad is what I expect
1 comments

Agreed. As a previous systemd hater I went there looking for an abstract, high-level argument. I got drivel instead.

One compelling argument I’ve seen is that it tries to be too much which violates the Unix philosophy of small tools doing a single thing well.

After years of using it I have to conclude that it’s here to stay and while not perfect it’s good enough I’m not going through the hell of tearing it out.

> I’ve seen is that it tries to be too much which violates the Unix philosophy of small tools doing a single thing well

Usually the same crowd that makes this complaint about systemd also have a strong affinity to Xorg and dislike to Wayland.

Xorg has a print server among many other things. Adhering to the UNIX philosophy is certainly something it does not.

This is about as correct as saying http is bloated because there are printer protocols using REST.